apfelkuchen mit haferflocken ohne mehl | juan garcia abrego wife
Therefore, you must carefully evaluate the testimony of any government witness who is cooperating, or has cooperated, in exchange for or with the hope that the prosecutor will file a 5K1.1 motion or Rule 35 motion to reduce the sentence of the witness. See United States v. Tolliver, 61 F.3d 1189, 1216 (5th Cir.1995) (holding that the defendant possessed managerial authority over individuals for purposes of the CCE statute because they worked for one of the defendant's subordinates), vacated on other grounds, Sterling v. United States, 516 U.S. 1105, 116 S.Ct. Indeed, it was about when the couple launched the 3578, 3581. In hopes that law enforcement authorities could eliminate his competition for him and save him the trouble of doing it himself, Garcia Abrego turned this information over to FBI Agent Claudio DeLaO, who was masquerading as a corrupt agent in an attempt to effect Garcia Abrego's arrest. By Chivis 1/22/2017 10:44:00 AM. R. Evid. See id. The chief investigator added that some ties to drug traffickers also are among the suspected motives, adding that detectives are looking into it carefully. But Romero provided no additional details. From this evidence, the jury could reasonably conclude that the drug offense charged in count 6 was committed by Garcia Abrego's coconspirators in furtherance of the conspiracy. Rivas also testified that Elias El Profe Garcia and Hilario Gonzalez were involved in arranging transportation of cocaine for the group. Furthermore, Tony Ortiz testified that, in November 1992, he delivered approximately $40,000 to Medrano for use in bribing a Mexican official. The Ramirezes' dimming hopes of ever learning Albert's fate renewed this week, thanks to the arrest in Mexico of reputed drug lord Juan Garcia Abrego. Juan Garcia Abrego is escorted from FBI headquarters in Houston in 1996 after his arrest in Mexico. Gen. Antonio Lozano Gracia, himself was charged with taking bribes from drug traffickers. denied sub nom., 519 U.S. 1045, 117 S.Ct. We are satisfied that any error in the district court's instruction was not plain error because Garcia Abrego has demonstrated no prejudicial impact, and thus no detrimental effect on his substantial rights. The above evidence would allow the jury to conclude that the funds seized from the Jeep Wagoneer had been giv[en] over to the care or possession of another one or more times, thus establishing the transaction element of the money laundering offense. Carlos Rodriguez testified that he arranged shipments of cocaine to George Paulicastro's warehouse in New Jersey. Garcia Abrego objected on the ground that Dr. Coleman ha[d] testified that he is not qualified as an expert in that area of practice. The district court overruled the objection on the ground that Dr. Coleman ha[d] practical experience sufficient to give his opinion. Dr. Coleman then testified that [s]omeone who has taken Valium for a long period of time, depending on the doses which he has been taking, may have some resistance to that medication and that such a person oftentimes can take dosages which are quite high and not manifest the typical symptoms of sedation of someone who does not use this medication.. 401 (Relevant evidence means evidence having any tendency to make the existence of any fact that is of consequence to the determination of the action more probable or less probable than it would be without the evidence. (emphasis added)); cf. Arrest warrants had also been issued in the past but Benito Gonzales was the brother of Marcos Gonzales, who Tony Ortiz testified worked for him transporting cocaine. 900, 133 L.Ed.2d 834 (1996), and vacated on other grounds, Moore v. United States, 519 U.S. 802, 117 S.Ct. Marroqun-Garca drove the vehicle to We reject both of these contentions. Juan Garca Abrego (CDG Founder) and Alfredo Beltrn Leyva in US Federal Prison . Juan Garcia Abrego is currently serving eleven life sentences in a U.S. jail for his drug trafficking. Specifically, he argues that admission of the records violated 18 U.S.C. 16. On two men argued over cash and jewelry they found inside the home. Garca Abrego Id. The jury could reasonably conclude that this series of events involved one or more dispositions of the money later recovered from the van because, on more than one occasion, the van, along with its contents, was giv[en] over to the care or possession of another. Puig-Infante, 19 F.3d at 938 (internal quotation marks omitted). I know something about it, being a lawyer. Alberto Sicilia Falcon is his name. One of the FBI agents involved in the seizure at the Almeda-Genoa warehouse testified that he was conducting surveillance at the Wharton airport in Houston and that he observed a blue pickup registered to Guadalupe Velez. At Borderland Beat we do this for our readers and it's always nice to hear their appreciation. 2. Tony Ortiz testified that, during his involvement with Garcia Abrego's organization, he shipped between $60 and 70 million in drug proceeds from New York and Houston back to Matamoros. 1060, 140 L.Ed.2d 121 (1998); see also United States v. Fernandez-Roque, 703 F.2d 808, 814-15 (5th Cir.1983). Tony Ortiz testified that he had met Nieto at Medrano's home, where Nieto was meeting with Medrano to discuss cocaine transportation. Guerra was reportedly responsible for masterminding the notorious 1984 clinic massacre in Matamoros that pushed Juan to the top of the cartel. From this point forward, law enforcement officials maintained constant surveillance of the van until the time of its seizure. denied, 522 U.S. 1063, 118 S.Ct. 1956(a)(1)(A)(i), three counts of money laundering in violation of 18 U.S.C. Drug traffickers usually avoid touching the family because the results tend to get too bloody, she said. bookstores nationwide, Balderas' behavior at home was raising the fury A wonderful country like Mexico and guys rude it. Ricardo Cordero Ontiveros said he . Conspiracy is a continuing offense. Humberto Garcia Abrego is Juan's brother and a suspected drug boss himself. the fateful night of the murders, the suspects only intended to kill the Notorious Narcos - AskMen In recorded conversations on May 2, 1991, Vega and Jesse Ceballos discussed Vega's having a secret compartment built into a trailer for the transport of cocaine. Compare 18 U.S.C. In addition, he points to Dr. Keraga's testimony that she [did not] imagine that he would have been able to understand his Miranda rights. But Rule 403 only excludes evidence that would be unfairly prejudicial to the defendant. United States v. Townsend, 31 F.3d 262, 270 (5th Cir.1994). But Figueroas book did not receive universal acclaim from anti-narcotics activists. A:I am not certain what the-qualifications are needed to be an expert on this medication. Garcia Abrego's claim that the government violated his right to due process through the use of inducements to obtain favorable testimony from witnesses therefore lacks merit. Email This BlogThis! Contact us. Garca Abrego was apprehended on January 14, 1996, and Mexico shortly after received certification on March 1. Garcia Abrego's inability to understand his Miranda rights rendered his custodial statement involuntary and therefore inadmissible on Fifth Amendment grounds. Sufficiency of the evidence establishing a conspiracy. The gunman seemed intent on killing everyone, Garcia said. Garcia Abrego also protected his organization by attempting to maintain a low profile. See Ponce, 8 F.3d at 998. Climate change sparks disaster fears, A powerhouse U.S. doctor slain in Sudan, killed for nothing, In final Mass in Budapest, pope urges Hungary to open doors, What GOPs plan for Medicaid work requirements would mean. Family Hopes Abrego Arrest Will Bring Answers to Son's Kidnapping This argument also lacks merit. It is home to the Unabomber Theodore Kaczynski, Boston Marathon bomber Dzhokhar Tsarnaev and former FBI agent Robert Hanssen, who was convicted of espionage. 1956(h) also lacks an overt act requirement. Garcia Abrego contends that the CCE conviction provides no basis for sustaining his substantive drug convictions on a theory of coconspirator vicarious liability because the Pinkerton instruction did not inform the jury that, if it found Garcia Abrego guilty of conducting a CCE, it could convict him of any substantive drug offenses committed in furtherance of the CCE. We therefore conclude that sufficient evidence exists to support Garcia Abrego's convictions of the substantive drug counts. The only evidence that the district court heard indicating mistreatment by Mexican authorities consisted of testimony and out-of-court statements from Garcia Abrego himself, and the court was free to make a negative credibility assessment regarding this evidence. However, when the first page of the book Figueroa wrote about the drug The transfer of the $108,000 to Vega clearly constituted a giving over to the care or possession of another, and thus a transaction for purposes of establishing a money laundering offense. Testimony presented by the government will invariably be prejudicial to a criminal defendant. ), cert. Id. Jaime Rivas Gonzales testified that he moved between thirty-three and forty tons of cocaine for the organization, and Carlos Rodriguez testified that he moved over fifty tons. and Josefina, who both share the last name of hernandez but are (He had been arrested and released twice in corruption, and in the past worked for Mexico City's Garcia Abrego conclusorily argues that insufficient evidence existed for the jury to conclude beyond a reasonable doubt that he acted as an organizer, supervisor, or manager of five or more individuals in his narcotics trafficking activities. In 1996, Mexican authorities arrested Garcia Abrego after Resendez informed them where he was hiding. 702. A California law says yes, NYC partly closes 4 parking garages after deadly collapse. 18 U.S.C. very outspoken about the alleged ties between the government and Ese era el negocio principal de El Cacho. Garcia Abrego asserts a number of challenges to the admissibility of the foreign bank records under the Federal Rules of Evidence. In the indictment, Garca Abrego was Mexican Drug Cartel Chief Convicted in U.S. - Los Angeles Times Section 3505 was not intended to add technical roadblocks to the admission of foreign records, but, rather, to streamline the admission of such records. United States v. Strickland, 935 F.2d 822, 831 (7th Cir.1991). Apparently recognizing the futility of simply arguing that the jury could not rationally conclude beyond a reasonable doubt that he organized, managed, or supervised five or more individuals in his drug trafficking enterprise, Garcia Abrego principally argues that his conviction for conducting a CCE must be set aside because the jury could have concluded that he supervised individuals who as a matter of law could not constitute his supervisees (e.g., individuals with whom Garcia Abrego merely had a buyer/seller relationship). (3)in the case of a person convicted of engaging in a continuing criminal enterprise in violation of section 848 of this title, the person shall forfeit, in addition to any property described in paragraph (1) or (2), any of his interest in, claims against, and property or contractual rights affording a source of control over, the continuing criminal enterprise. in their stylish home in the Pedregal district of Mexico However, we conclude that this lack of diligence did not render the records inadmissible under the statute. At FindLaw.com, we pride ourselves on being the number one source of free legal information and resources on the web. Alejandro Trevino-Morales (Captured) - United States Department of State This is all that is necessary to render the evidence legally relevant. denied sub nom., 522 U.S. 922, 118 S.Ct. 6. Counsel for Garcia Abrego and Dr. Coleman engaged in the following exchange regarding Dr. Coleman's knowledge of Valium dependency: Q:Now, do you know anything at all, sir, about Valium habituation or Valium dependency? You have to be hardcore and crazy if you dont fear satan. The jury could reasonably conclude that Vega's purchase of the trash compactors and bags entailed a transaction within the meaning of 1956(a)(1). Your research and work is very much appreciated. On each occasion, Perez spent from $50,000 to $80,000. As a physician who uses these medications on a daily basis, I have to be knowledgeable about those medications. This is FRONTLINE's old website. A motion opposing admission in evidence of such record shall be made by the opposing party and determined by the court before trial. Jurors found Garcia Abrego, 52, guilty of smuggling 15 tons of cocaine into the United States and laundering about $10.5 million. 1770, 1776-79, 123 L.Ed.2d 508 (1993). Garcia Abrego also contends that the government's hypothetical question regarding the effects of a twenty-milligram dose of Valium on a person who has used the drug for many years is not the type of hearsay reasonably relied upon by experts in [Dr. Coleman's field] and that Dr. Coleman's answer to the question was therefore inadmissible. He was arrested on a ranch outside of Monterrey on January 14, 1996. Additionally, Juan Ibarra was present when Vega picked up the money on May 3, 1991. Evidence of other crimes, wrongs, or acts is not admissible to prove the character of a person in order to show action in conformity therewith. leadership of Oscar Malherbe de Leon. Fue jefe del Crtel del Golfo . A grand jury indicted Garcia Abrego on twenty-two counts of a twenty-eight-count indictment, including ten counts of possession of cocaine with intent to distribute in violation of 21 U.S.C. 1194, 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963); the accused must be given an adequate opportunity to cross-examine the informant and government agents about any agreement to compensate the witness; and the trial court should give a special jury instruction pointing out the suspect credibility of paid witnesses. I think he may have died. the drug trade in Colombia. Garcia Abrego appeals his conviction and sentence on the following fourteen grounds: 1. See United States v. Bermea, 30 F.3d 1539, 1552 (5th Cir.1994). Thus, we cannot say that the district court's determination that the medication that Garcia Abrego received did not render him mentally impaired at the time of his interview with law enforcement officials was clearly erroneous.16. Juan Garcia Abrego photo shot in January 1996 HOUCHRON CAPTION (09/20/1999): Juan Garcia Abrego was convicted in Houston in October 1996 of 22 counts of drug trafficking, conspiracy, money laundering and operating a continuing criminal enterprises. Rivas also testified that, during a telephone conversation, Nieto told him that he had lost a load of cocaine at the Almeda-Genoa warehouse. Moreover, the district court dismissed the drug conspiracy count only because it constituted a lesser-included offense of the CCE count of which the jury also found Garcia Abrego guilty. Indeed, he has not even alleged the existence of witnesses who would have been willing to testify in his favor had he been able to offer them incentives similar to those offered by the government. Insufficient evidence supported Garcia Abrego's convictions of money laundering. His experience with Valium prescription and patient observation, along with his medical training, formed the basis of his opinion. "It doesn't look as though robbery was the motive. Agent Claudio DeLaO testified that, during conversations with Luis Medrano, Medrano referred to Garcia Abrego as El Jefe and Patron, both Spanish words signifying substantial authority. Gulf Cartel - InSight Crime Failure of a party to raise an objection before trial constitutes a waiver of the objection. Garcia Abrego contends that his convictions for these substantive drug offenses are not sustainable on a theory of coconspirator vicarious liability. See id. Garcia Abrego points out that Olivella was removed as a beneficial owner from this account a few days after it was opened. His FBI G.Sufficiency of the Evidence Supporting the Conviction for Conducting a CCE. 1956(c)(3) (defining transaction to include a purchase). Specifically, these safeguards include the following: The government must not use or encourage the use of perjured testimony; the government must completely and timely disclose the fee arrangement to the accused in accordance with Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 83 S.Ct. (b)At the arraignment or as soon after the arraignment as practicable, a party intending to offer in evidence under this section a foreign record of regularly conducted activity shall provide written notice of that intention to each other party. As with the issue of the voluntariness of a custodial confession, a district court's determination regarding the validity of a defendant's waiver of his Miranda rights is a question of law reviewed de novo, but this court accepts the factual conclusions underlying the district court's legal determination unless they are clearly erroneous. Admission of the evidence did not violate Rule 404(b). The next day, Cortez drove the van back to Memorial City Mall and turned it over to an unidentified individual who drove the van to Rapid Truck Repair. See Miller, 116 F.3d at 682; Krout, 66 F.3d at 1431. According to the indictment issued on 8 November 1978, sometime However, the matters that the statute requires that the certification address mirror the four requirements for rendering a normal business record admissible under the business records exception to the hearsay rule, none of which are case-specific. U.S. authorities Rhodes v. Guiberson Oil Tools, 75 F.3d 989, 998 n. 2 (5th Cir.1996) (en banc) (Emilio M. Garza, J., concurring) ([T]he standard of relevancy under Rule 401 is intentionally much easier to satisfy than the standard for sufficiency of the evidence). Tijuana. Man who lost wife, son in Texas mass shooting tells story Jack the Ripper at the time." Vega testified that he then went to Houston, met up with Oscar Abelenda, a cocaine dealer who was a customer of Ceballos. May 1, 2023 at 12:12 a.m. EDT. The record contains ample evidence from which the district court could conclude that the drugs that Mexican authorities administered to Garcia Abrego did not impair his mental capacity. Junto con su hermano, ambos trabajaron en labores agrcolas hasta que se unieron a su to Juan Nepomuceno Guerra y los convirti en prsperos empresarios. legitimate businessman, owned land in Mexico and lived quietly in Brownsville With the arrest of one of Garca Abrego's traffickers, Juan Antonio Ortiz, it became known the cartel would ship tons of cocaine in United States Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) buses between the years of 1986 to 1990. If a member of the group overstepped his authority, the consequences were dire. Juan Flores de Abrego. Garca Abrego himself, was involved in the drug trade long before him. denied sub nom., 520 U.S. 1149, 117 S.Ct. Francisco Segura testified that he originally worked for Tony Ortiz and was later ordered by Medrano and Malherbe to collect drug debts in New York. El Padrino of the Gulf Cartel. These individuals in turn utilized the services of numerous other individuals to package and deliver the cocaine and to collect and deliver the money. 3139, 3149, 111 L.Ed.2d 638 (1990); see also Sherman, 62 F.3d at 140. Birthdate: 1685. He also moved to Monterey, a city deeper inside Mexico than Matamoros, and essentially went into seclusion so that he was not accessible to people outside his organization. 515, 522, 93 L.Ed.2d 473 (1986). Insufficient evidence supported Garcia Abrego's convictions of the substantive drug offenses. When Oscar El Profe Lopez Olivares, formerly a valued member of Garcia Abrego's organization, made statements to the press threatening to expose a high-level narcotics operation in Matamoros along with its organizer, Garcia Abrego attempted to have him killed and, through Luis Medrano, enlisted the assistance of Agent DeLaO in this regard. Carlos Rodriguez testified that he began trafficking cocaine at the direction of Medrano and Malherbe in 1986 and that they dictated the Colombian cartel with whom he was allowed to do business. [4] Garcia Abrego was involved in car theft activities since the 1970s along with his best friend Lctor Hazael Marroqun Garca. The hypothetical question itself was obviously not the basis of Dr. Coleman's opinion. La captura. Garca brego 20 aos despus | El Universal Garcia Abrego's conviction of conspiracy to launder money violated the Ex Post Facto Clause because it was based on conduct that occurred prior to the enactment of the harsher penalty provisions of 18 U.S.C. 1880, 1884-85, 68 L.Ed.2d 378 (1981) (holding that, once the accused asserts this Fifth Amendment right to counsel and thereby expresse[s] his desire to deal with the police only through counsel, [he] is not subject to further interrogation by the authorities until counsel has been made available to him, unless the accused himself initiates further communication, exchanges, or conversations with the police).[T]his court has repeatedly held [that] we will not review arguments raised for the first time in a reply brief. NLRB v. Cal-Maine Farms, Inc., 998 F.2d 1336, 1342 (5th Cir.1993). denied sub nom., 522 U.S. 1034, 118 S.Ct. Garcia Abrego also complains that the documents were not accompanied by a proper certification as required by 3505(a)(1). Dr. Keraga admitted that these effects might be different for a chronic user of Valium. The United States Government requested US$1.05billion but the jury, after an hour of deliberation, agreed to only US$350million. 142, 136 L.Ed.2d 89 (1996); Bermea, 30 F.3d at 1577; United States v. Garfinkel, 29 F.3d 1253, 1259 (8th Cir.1994); United States v. Jackson, 845 F.2d 1262, 1265 (5th Cir.1988). plotted the murders of the couple, investigators say. 4. Below are the 18 individuals who were charged in the indictment: Though not mentioned in the indictment, the vehicle theft industry scandalous case all but closed, alleging that the fugitive couple and Committee on Pattern Jury Instructions, District Judges Ass'n Fifth Cir., Pattern Jury Instructions (Criminal Cases) 239 (1997). The business records exception is a firmly rooted hearsay exception. Ismoila, 100 F.3d at 392. In the early 1980s he began incorporating cocaine into the cartel's trafficking operations. 18. Dear Netflix, there is no way in hell this is Matamoros (the scene is too pretty), the restaurant was Piedras Negras, not Restaurante Matamoros and there is no Sheriff de Brownsville #NarcosMexico2 . We have acknowledged that the government must observe certain procedural safeguards when it intends to offer testimony of a witness receiving some sort of compensation for his testimony. student Mark Kilroy in Matamoros. All of this testimony indicates that the killings at issue were in furtherance of Garcia Abrego's drug-trafficking enterprise. Saludos compa. Juan Garcia Abrego, the first international drug trafficker to appear on the U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation's 10 Most Wanted List, landed in U.S. custody late last month marking the end of a . 1956(h). (A)such record was made, at or near the time of the occurrence of the matters set forth, by (or from information transmitted by) a person with knowledge of those matters; (B)such record was kept in the course of a regularly conducted business activity; (C)the business activity made such a record as a regular practice; and. See United States v. Graewe, 774 F.2d 106, 108 (6th Cir.1985) (A [CCE] charge is a conspiracy charge, and one convicted of a CCE is subject to Pinkerton liability.).3. Our conclusion is bolstered by the fact that the statute requires district courts to exclude records otherwise satisfying its requirements if the source of information or the method or circumstances of preparation indicate lack of trustworthiness. 18 U.S.C. The buses made great transportation, as Antonio Ortiz noted, since they were never stopped at the border. Attorney General -- who was fired this week, just two days 3505 (providing that foreign records meeting its criteria shall not be excluded as evidence by the hearsay rule); Sturman, 951 F.2d at 1490 (Section 3505 establishes an exception to the hearsay rule for foreign business documents.). Day of the Dead up until his arrest in 1996. [C]oercive police activity is a necessary predicate to the finding that a confession is not voluntary within the meaning of the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Colorado v. Connelly, 479 U.S. 157, 167, 107 S.Ct. Between 1989 and 1993, U.S. law enforcement officials seized over thirteen tons of the organization's cocaine, but this was but a fraction of the amount that the organization successfully smuggled into the United States. 846, one count of conspiracy to launder money in violation of 18 U.S.C. See United States v. Barlow, 41 F.3d 935, 944 n. 26 (5th Cir.1994).17 Garcia Abrego contends that the solicitousness of law enforcement officials constituted an exploitation of his vulnerable mental state. Garcia Abrego was sentenced to 11 life terms and fined $128 million in 1997. After nearly 20 years in the so-called federal supermax, where some of the nations most notorious inmates are kept, Garcia Abrego was recently transferred to a high-security penitentiary, according to federal records. [7], Once the cocaine crossed the border into the United States it was believed to reach distribution networks across the country in cities such as San Antonio, Houston and New York City, with smaller elements in Dallas, Chicago, New Orleans, Oklahoma City, California and Arizona. Juan Garcia Abrego (standing): Former leader of the Gulf Cartel.4. at 1778. The fact that Garcia Abrego did not directly control the actions of many of these individuals is irrelevant; that their actions were directly supervised or managed by individuals to whom Garcia Abrego delegated authority indicates that Garcia Abrego organized, supervised, or managed them for purposes of 848. Federal jury, Houston, Tex, convicts Juan Garcia Abrego of 22 counts of money laundering, drug possession and operating criminal enterprise that allegedly smuggled more than 200,000 pounds of . 40, 136 L.Ed.2d 4 (1996); United States v. Hinojosa, 958 F.2d 624, 630 (5th Cir.1992) ([A] defendant may not insulate himself from CCE liability by carefully pyramiding authority so as to maintain fewer than five direct subordinates. (quoting United States v. Ricks, 882 F.2d 885, 891 (4th Cir.1989) (brackets in original))). [19][20], Following the arrest of Garca Abrego, Osiel Crdenas Guillen took over the cartel. Juan Garca Abrego had grown to such lengths that he was placed on the FBI Top Ten Most Wanted List of 1995. Garcia Abrego asserts that the funds at issue in these counts were not exported to Matamoros, Mexico. this man got something like 7 life sentences and never snitchedhe did like 20 years at Florence dont make them like that anymorehe didnt kidnapp or extort either. After a lengthy trial, the jury found Garcia Abrego guilty of all twenty-two counts. Learn more about FindLaws newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy. 12. A confession is voluntary if, under the totality of the circumstances, the statement is the product of the accused's free and rational choice. United States v. Broussard, 80 F.3d 1025, 1033 (5th Cir. Stay up-to-date with how the law affects your life. Martin Dr. Coleman's testimony that Garcia Abrego did not appear impaired and evinced none of the symptoms of a Valium overdose, together with the testimony of the officers who interviewed Garcia Abrego that he appeared in no way impaired, provided an adequate basis for the district court's conclusion that Garcia Abrego's mental capacity was not impaired as a result of the drugs that he had been administered earlier in the day. Carlos Resendez testified that he also purchased Valium for Garcia Abrego on occasion and that Garcia Abrego was accustomed to using Valium. Effect of prior un-Mirandized statements.
Rhea County Sheriff Under Investigation,
Articles J
As a part of Jhan Dhan Yojana, Bank of Baroda has decided to open more number of BCs and some Next-Gen-BCs who will rendering some additional Banking services. We as CBC are taking active part in implementation of this initiative of Bank particularly in the states of West Bengal, UP,Rajasthan,Orissa etc.
We got our robust technical support team. Members of this team are well experienced and knowledgeable. In addition we conduct virtual meetings with our BCs to update the development in the banking and the new initiatives taken by Bank and convey desires and expectation of Banks from BCs. In these meetings Officials from the Regional Offices of Bank of Baroda also take part. These are very effective during recent lock down period due to COVID 19.
Information and Communication Technology (ICT) is one of the Models used by Bank of Baroda for implementation of Financial Inclusion. ICT based models are (i) POS, (ii) Kiosk. POS is based on Application Service Provider (ASP) model with smart cards based technology for financial inclusion under the model, BCs are appointed by banks and CBCs These BCs are provided with point-of-service(POS) devices, using which they carry out transaction for the smart card holders at their doorsteps. The customers can operate their account using their smart cards through biometric authentication. In this system all transactions processed by the BC are online real time basis in core banking of bank. PoS devices deployed in the field are capable to process the transaction on the basis of Smart Card, Account number (card less), Aadhar number (AEPS) transactions.