sturm der liebe neue darsteller 2021 | david ray mccoy sheila daniels chicago
Despite the presence of this fact, which was known to defendant at her first trial, she did not assert it as a reason for suppression before Judge Toomin. As to the scope of the subpoenas, the defendant in Hinton sought only the complaints of excessive force made against the detectives who were identified in the defendant's case. 321, 696 N.E.2d 313. At the time, he was also in the police station and was bleeding after having been beaten by police. 71, 356 N.E.2d 71 (1976). In doing so, we relied upon the United States Supreme Court's decision in Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. Applying the analysis used in Hobley I and Hobley II to the facts before it, this court in Hinton held that the new evidence presented in the defendant's postconviction petition did not entitle the defendant to an evidentiary hearing because he, like Hobley, did not present sufficient evidence of an injury. Under similar facts, the same result was reached in People v. King, 192 Ill.2d 189, 198-99, 248 Ill.Dec. She asserts their testimony constitutes new evidence, which bars application of the law of the case doctrine. Defendant acknowledges that the support for his contention is not contained in the record, but he raises the error "so as to present defendant's ineffective assistance of counsel claim in it's (sic) proper perspective," promising to file a post-conviction petition raising this issue. In determining that the defendant had failed to show that the sentencing error in his case was prejudicial, the court in Crespo held: we have no doubt that a jury, presented with these facts, would have found that the crime was committed in a brutal and heinous manner, indicative of wanton cruelty. Crespo, 203 Ill.2d at 348-49, 273 Ill.Dec. This court recently addressed this issue. Further, there is no credible evidence in this record that the defendant's will was overborne ***.. After hearing the testimony and the arguments of counsel, the court denied defendant's motion, finding that the police had probable cause to arrest defendant and that defendant's statements were not coerced by the police, but rather were voluntarily given. Defendant then wiped all fingerprints off Sheila's gun and left it in the car by McCoy, locking all the doors of the car, which he left there. In rejecting the State's argument, this court relied on the holding of our supreme court in People v. Williams, 138 Ill.2d 377, 150 Ill.Dec. She asserts that had this court and Judge Toomin had the benefit of the United States Supreme Court's ruling in Thompson v. Keohane, 516 U.S. 99, 116 S.Ct. See e.g., People v. Lee, 319 Ill.App.3d 289, 307, 253 Ill.Dec. She later filed her reoffered motion to suppress, which was also denied. In People v. Maxwell, 173 Ill.2d 102, 219 Ill.Dec. There are variousreports of the motive behind McCoys murder. Consequently, we affirm our prior order vacating defendant's extended-term sentence and remanding this case to the trial court for resentencing. A South Side woman has been convicted for the second time of killing millionaire David Ray McCoy, her live-in boyfriend, in 1988. Cline responded, She was not under arrest. 143, 706 N.E.2d 1017. Thereafter, the assistant State's Attorney spoke with defendant and advised him of his rights. Defendant further argues that because she had first-hand knowledge of the accuracy of the records, the trial court should have admitted them into evidence. 343, 795 N.E.2d 1011 (2003) and People v. Alvarez, 344 Ill.App.3d 179, 278 Ill.Dec. iloveoldschoolmusic.com. See People v. Williams, 138 Ill.2d 377, 392, 150 Ill.Dec. 688], 721 N.E.2d 1219, 1221 (1999), [judgment vacated by People v. Huff, 195 Ill.2d 87 [253 Ill.Dec. Sheila and her brother Tyrone were both found guilty; Sheila was sentenced to 80 years in prison and Tyrone to 60 years. On September 16, 1997 just one year before Lisa Raye made her debut in The Players Club and during the height of Da Brats multiplatinum selling career- their dads girlfriend, Sheila Daniels, was officially convicted AGAIN for his murder. People v. Enis, 163 Ill.2d 367, 386 [206 Ill.Dec. Shortly thereafter, defendant was interviewed by an assistant State's Attorney, who advised him of his rights. On appeal, defendant contends: (1) that the trial court erred in refusing to hold an evidentiary hearing on her motions to suppress statements; (2) that the trial court erred in quashing her subpoenas to the City of Chicago (City); (3) that the trial court erred in refusing to send her medical reports to the jury during its deliberations; and (4) that her 80-year sentence is unconstitutional under Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. This new evidence would not cure defendant's inability to establish that he sustained an injury. Hinton, 302 Ill.App.3d at 625, 236 Ill.Dec. She was born to a Chicago city bus driver mother Nadine Brewer and businessman father David Ray McCoy. v. 108, 744 N.E.2d 841] (2001)].. The circuit court expressly found that she was not arrested or seized in her home, but instead voluntarily accompanied the officers to the police station. 98. We have vacated our prior opinion in a separate order and we determine that our prior decision to vacate the defendant's extended-term sentence was proper. A review of Judge Toomin's statements in open court establishes that he applied this test when ruling on defendant's motion to suppress. See People v. Chengary, 301 Ill.App.3d 895, 897, 235 Ill.Dec. David was killed by his then-long-term girlfriend, Sheila Daniels, and her brother. See Greenspawn, 346 Ill. at 491, 179 N.E. The X-rays had been taken in Chicago at the same time he had allegedly attempted to negotiate a fraudulent check in Rockford. In support of her claim of error, defendant relies upon People v. Greenspawn, 346 Ill. 484, 179 N.E. It was further argued that whether defendant's status at the police station became custodial before she was informed she was under arrest at 3 a.m. had not been previously raised. Contact us. (Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 689, 104 S.Ct. 241, 788 N.E.2d 1117 (2003). After a discussion of the evidence and the applicable case law, which consisted almost entirely of defendant's arguments based on the fourth amendment, we held, Accordingly, we find that the circuit court properly denied her motion to suppress. Daniels I, 272 Ill.App.3d at 336, 208 Ill.Dec. Defendant maintains that had his attorney argued that his psychological state of mind was such that he would have done anything Sheila had told him to do, his motion to suppress his statement as involuntary would have been granted. Thereafter, defendant drove McCoy's car to an alley near McCoy's place of business, with Sheila following in her own car. Defendant agreed, and while accompanied by three officers, arrived at the police station around 5:30 p.m. that day. David Ray Mccoy was brutally killed on 13 November 1988, in Chicago, Cook County, Illinois, USA, at the age of 53 years. Upon the City's motion for reconsideration, the trial court, finding that defendant was undertaking a fishing expedition, granted the City's motion to quash the subpoenas. In reversing that determination, the Supreme Court stated, We hold, not for the first time, that an officer's subjective and undisclosed view concerning whether the person being interrogated is a suspect is irrelevant to the assessment whether the person is in custody. Stansbury, 511 U.S. at 319, 114 S.Ct. Lisa Raye (best known to us old schoolers as Diamond in the Players Club) and rapper, Da Brat, are biological sisters with the same father, David Ray McCoy. In an amended postconviction petition, the defendant argued the existence of new evidence, that being the OPS report, warranted a hearing on his petition. 312, 556 N.E.2d 1214. 553, 696 N.E.2d 849 (1998). In People v. Lawson, 327 Ill.App.3d 60, 261 Ill.Dec. The court continued: As to the right to counsel, it is, of course, the State's burden to establish the voluntariness and this essentially refines itself to issues of credibility in this case. The trial court overruled the objection, stating that defendant could look at the records while testifying, but could not read from them. With respect to her fourth amendment claim, he found that defendant had voluntarily accompanied police to the station. 509, 554 N.E.2d 444. 154, 704 N.E.2d 727 (1998). In so ruling, the Court stated that the ultimate determination for whether a defendant is in custody for Miranda purposes involved [t]wo discrete inquiries ***: first, what were the circumstances surrounding the interrogation; and second, given those circumstances, would a reasonable person have felt he or she was not at liberty to terminate the interrogation and leave. Thompson, 516 U.S. at 112, 116 S.Ct. People v. Cannon, 150 Ill.App.3d 1009, 1024-25, 104 Ill.Dec. (See People v. Majer (1985), 131 Ill.App.3d 80, 86 Ill.Dec. The trial court denied the defendant's request for a new suppression hearing. The defendant told the police that she shot the victim only after he had beaten her and threatened to kill her. david ray mccoy obituary chicagochris mccausland wife patricia. Defendant's conviction arose from the November 12, 1988, shooting death of McCoy in the garage of the home that he, defendant and her daughter shared at 1654 East 92nd Street in Chicago. M. Graham, Cleary & Graham's Handbook of Illinois Evidence 803.11, at 830 (7th ed.1999). McCoy, 53, a self-made millionaire and bon vivant, was found dead in the back seat of his black Cadillac on Nov. 12, 1988. 767, 650 N.E.2d 224. Putting aside the fact that this claim is nothing more than mere speculation on defendant's part and ignores all of the evidence presented by the State in support of her conviction, the fact remains that a proper foundation was not laid for admission of the records into evidence. In People v. Cannon, 293 Ill.App.3d 634, 227 Ill.Dec. 498, 563 N.E.2d 385. The fact that defendant did not ask for this to be done indicates that defendant's theory in her first motion to suppress had nothing to do with Tyrone's condition. There are various reports of the motive behind McCoy's murder. Constitutionality of extended term sentence. After learning she had failed the exam, she implicated her brother Tyrone in McCoy's murder. However, she did not attempt to call Tyrone at the hearing on her motion. Absent an abuse of discretion, this court will not reverse the trial court's determination with respect to the admission of exhibits into evidence. 604], 645 N.E.2d 856, 864 (1994). A jury of nine women and three men returned a verdict of guilty of first-degree murder against Sheila Daniels, 41, late Monday night. In fact, the section of Cleary and Graham relating to the admission of medical and hospital records explains that while the requirement of calling all persons who made the entries to testify has virtually disappeared with respect to the admission of business records, it continues to be applied to medical records. As for defendant's claim that there was new evidence upon which to reopen the motion to suppress statements, again, we disagree. mesquite to las vegas airport; greenville public school district address; houses for rent in huntsville, al under $600; Blog Post Title February 26, 2018. The order was affirmed on appeal. She claims the propriety of the police conduct once she arrived at Area 2, which implicates a fifth amendment violation, has never been ruled upon. In fact, the motion to suppress at issue in Daniels I makes no mention of Tyrone's or Anthony's condition as a basis for defendant's statements. When defendant, who had brought the records to court with her, was questioned by defense counsel regarding the records, the State objected on the ground the documents had not been certified. The fact that Lt. Cline was of the opinion that defendant was not under arrest and not in custody does not alter the fact that Judge Toomin applied the proper test and concluded that her admissions to police were admissible. Defendant argues that Sheila's statement "figured prominently" in the court's determination and thus, because that statement was "admitted solely due to defense counsel's efforts[,] obviously defendant has been deprived of effective assistance of counsel.". See M. Graham, Cleary & Graham's Handbook of Illinois Evidence 602.1, at 369 (7th ed.1999). 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000). at 2362-63, 147 L.Ed.2d at 455. The sequence of events relating to the arrests of Anthony and Tyrone as recited in Daniels I, 272 Ill.App.3d at 333-34, 208 Ill.Dec. 82, 502 N.E.2d 345 (1986). 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000). The supreme court cited two facts which have been found to be special circumstances supporting a trial court's decision to hold new de novo hearings on motions to suppress after remand. Father of actress LisaRaye McCoy. Finally, defendant contends and that her 80-year extended-term sentence is unconstitutional under the United States Supreme Court's decision in Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. Presiding Justice QUINN delivered the opinion of the court: The email address cannot be subscribed. Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. David was killed by his then-long-term girlfriend, Sheila Daniels, and her brother. In the present cause, the order was to quash an arrest and suppress evidence, period. at 467, 133 L.Ed.2d at 396. This court first looked to the holdings in People v. Hobley, 159 Ill.2d 272, 202 Ill.Dec. 304, 745 N.E.2d 78 (2001); People v. Chanthaloth, 318 Ill.App.3d 806, 816, 252 Ill.Dec. They reportedly then drove McCoys body in his Cadillac to the alley and left him thereso sad. 64, 762 N.E.2d 633. 12, 735 N.E.2d 616 (2000), the defendant was convicted of two counts of murder committed during a forcible felony and was sentenced to death. Afterwards, defendant was interviewed by the assistant State's Attorney and gave substantially the same version. In response, the City moved to quash the subpoenas on the grounds that the materials requested were irrelevant and confidential and that the subpoenas were the result of speculative fishing expeditions. Alternatively, the City requested an in camera inspection of the documents and the issuance of a protective order in the event the subpoenas were not quashed. Also, at no time did Judge Toomin state that he was denying the motion to suppress based upon the opinions of police officers who questioned defendant as to their belief regarding whether defendant was in custody.. He was 52 years old. The proffered testimony of Tyrone and Anthony was included with the motion, substantiating the allegations of abuse contained in defendant's motion. 12, 735 N.E.2d 616. Tyrone did not testify at defendant's motion to suppress. He was 52 years old. Her parents were never married. The trial court's ruling with respect to a motion to quash a subpoena will not be reversed unless the trial court's finding of fact was manifestly erroneous. The motion was denied and our supreme court affirmed that ruling. People v. Davis, 322 Ill.App.3d 762, 765, 256 Ill.Dec. In making this determination, the Supreme Court stated that [o]ther than the fact of a prior conviction, any fact that increases the penalty for a crime beyond the prescribed statutory maximum must be submitted to a jury, and proved beyond a reasonable doubt. Apprendi, 530 U.S. at 490, 120 S.Ct. 1, 670 N.E.2d 679 (1996), the defendant similarly alleged that he was entitled to an evidentiary hearing on his postconviction petition because of newly discovered evidence regarding Area 2 which disclosed a pattern of brutality directed at suspects in custody. After the defense rested, the State objected to the admission of the medical records into evidence, on the ground that a proper foundation had not been laid. As we pointed out in Daniels I, defendant never asserted in her motion to suppress ruled upon by Judge Toomin that she confessed because she saw her brothers in a beaten condition. 241, 788 N.E.2d 1117. See Supreme Court Rule 413(c) (134 Ill.2d R. 413(c)) (requiring that the State be informed of, and permitted to inspect and copy or photograph, any reports or results, or testimony relative thereto, of physical or mental examinations ***.). Rather, the only evidence presented that defendant acquiesced to his sister's will was his statement that he took her advice to "tell the truth.". at 1527, 128 L.Ed.2d at 296. Accordingly, the judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed in part, vacated in part and this case is remanded for resentencing. In resentencing defendant upon remand, we would point out to the trial court that this defendant had no convictions prior to committing this offense. In response, the police told him that he "might as well tell everything * * * because your sister is fixing to go to jail for a murder." Thompson, 516 U.S. at 116, 116 S.Ct. At FindLaw.com, we pride ourselves on being the number one source of free legal information and resources on the web. In arguing that his trial counsel misapprehended the accountability law, however, defendant distorts the record and fails to mention any of his trial counsel's attempts to show that defendant in no manner participated in the planning or commission of the shooting of McCoy. at 2351, 147 L.Ed.2d at 442. 493, 564 N.E.2d 1155 (1990). She alleged that police informed her that they would continue beating Tyrone and might even subject her to physical cruelty unless she made admissions relating to her involvement in McCoy's murder. IV. While searching the apartment, the police told him to get dressed, giving him some of his clothes; they did not, however, provide him any underwear or socks. In Daniels I, defendant argued, inter alia, that Judge Toomin had erred in denying her motion to suppress statements. People v. Staten, 89 Ill.App.3d 1113, 1116, 45 Ill.Dec. 767, 650 N.E.2d 224. Their beloved father was a paraplegic who was also a wellestablished Southside Chicago businessman. In reliance upon this two-part inquiry, defendant argues that no longer does a defendant's voluntary and consensual trip to the police station to answer questions end the inquiry as to whether the defendant is in custody and entitled to Miranda warnings, as was ruled by Judge Toomin and this court in Daniels I. A person is legally accountable for the conduct of another when either before or during the commission of an offense, and with the intent to promote or facilitate such commission, he solicits, aids, abets, agrees or attempts to aid the other person in the planning or commission of the offense. When the police arrived at defendant's apartment, Cummings and several other officers knocked on defendant's door and identified themselves. The testimony presented established that Sheila Daniels and her daughter lived with McCoy. 256, 637 N.E.2d 992 (1994) (Hobley I), and People v. Hobley, 182 Ill.2d 404, 231 Ill.Dec. 604], 645 N.E.2d at 865. Moreover, the fact that defendant did not get the records until the day she testified in her retrial violated the letter and spirit of our rules relating to discovery. Defendant was not hit or struck or in any manner mistreated during his interrogation. 103, 84 Ill.2d 436, 443, 50 Ill.Dec. She testified that she gave a court-reported confession to a woman attorney, not realizing that she was an assistant State's Attorney. 69, 538 N.E.2d 444. Again, the record does not support defendant's assertion. After an evidentiary hearing, Judge Toomin denied defendant's motion to suppress. Defendant lastly argues that defense counsel improperly refused to allow him to testify. At no time in the apartment did the police advise him of his constitutional rights. Specifically, defendant contends that his trial counsel failed to effectively present his motion to suppress; failed to effectively argue the applicable law regarding accountability; successfully obtained the admission into evidence of the extrajudicial statement of Sheila Daniels; and refused to permit him to testify at trial. Cook County. A South Side woman has been convicted for the second time of killing millionaire David Ray McCoy, her live-in boyfriend, in 1988. . As a result of the beating, defendant sought treatment at Little Company of Mary Hospital. We follow those decisions and therefore, we vacate defendant's sentence and remand for imposition of a new sentence. David Ray Mccoy was killed by his girlfriend of 10 years, Sheila Daniels, and her brother, Tyrone. Owned motels and nightclubs in Chicago. by January 24, 2023 sanford bishop wife. He was found shot to death in the back seat of his Cadillac, which was parked in a Southside Chicago alley. 300, 631 N.E.2d 303 (1994). Six days later, Daniels was arrested after the murder weapon, a .25-caliber Beretta, was traced to her. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply. 98 (1931), where the trial court refused to admit X-rays of the defendant's teeth into evidence. Under the harmless error analysis, the burden is upon the State to prove that the jury verdict would have been the same absent the error to avoid reversal. Affirmed in part and vacated in part; cause remanded. Following a jury trial in 1990 before Judge Michael P. Toomin, defendant Sheila Daniels was convicted of the first degree murder of her paraplegic boyfriend, David McCoy, and was sentenced to an 80-year prison term.1 On appeal, with one justice dissenting, this court ruled, inter alia, that the trial court did not err in denying defendant's motion to suppress statements, but reversed defendant's conviction, finding the admission of polygraph results at her trial improper. This ruling meant that defendant was allowed to testify to the content of the medical records. He testified that the gun found near McCoy's body was eventually traced to Sheila Daniels, who, when questioned by the police, told them that defendant had killed McCoy; later, she led the police to defendant's apartment. New theories supporting suppression do not constitute additional evidence that has become available since the first hearing to suppress. Hattery, 183 Ill.App.3d at 805-06, 132 Ill.Dec. 20, 595 N.E.2d 83 (1992). Defendant contends on appeal that he was deprived of effective assistance of trial counsel. Considering the facts of the instant case, we simply cannot say that the State has meet its burden to show that the evidence was so overwhelming that the crime was accompanied by exceptionally brutal or heinous behavior indicative of wanton cruelty so that we have no doubt that a jury would have made this finding. 12, 751 N.E.2d 65 (2001). 38, par. (1) On appeal, with one justice dissenting, this court ruled, inter . Without evidence of injury, it was not error to exclude the prior allegations of abuse. This argument is without merit. In addition, Cummings testified that, at 4 a.m. in the police station, after he had been advised of his rights, defendant initially denied involvement in McCoy's murder. In her statement to the polygraph operator, defendant said Tyrone had the gun and he shot McCoy. Rumor has it that David's death was caused by a disagreement over a high power bill. In her motion to suppress filed before her first trial and in the first motion to suppress filed with Judge Urso, defendant said nothing about Anthony's beaten condition as being a reason for her inculpatory statements. The section of Cleary and Graham defendant relies upon relates to the personal knowledge requirement of testifying witnesses, not the requirements of admission of medical records. Crespo, 203 Ill.2d at 348-49, 273 Ill.Dec. 592, 610 N.E.2d 16 (1992). The trial court found that the defendant waived the issue of his allegedly coerced confession by failing to raise it on direct appeal. She alleged that during her interrogation, officers engaged in conduct calculated to psychologically and physically coerce her into making admissions as to her involvement in McCoy's murder, including exhibiting her brother Tyrone to her. While this court in Daniels I did not provide an analysis of our holding affirming the trial court's denial of defendant's motion to suppress based on fifth and sixth amendment grounds, we certainly addressed the legal issue raised by defendant and we rejected it. Father of actress LisaRaye McCoy. Here, defendant has never said she was beaten. The supreme court reversed that determination and granted the defendant a hearing on his petition. 499, 734 N.E.2d 207 (2000), where this court stated: [P]rinciples of collateral estoppel do not bar relitigation of a pretrial ruling after remand, where special circumstances are present. See 188 Ill.2d R. 341(e)(7); People v. Madej, 177 Ill.2d 116, 162, 226 Ill.Dec. McCoys then 32 year old live-in girlfriend of 10 years, Sheila Daniels, and her then 20 year old brother, Tyrone, were convicted of McCoys murder in 1990. 321, 696 N.E.2d 313 (1998) (Hobley II). Further, defendant cannot liken his situation to that of the defendant in People v. Rhoads (1979), 73 Ill.App.3d 288, 29 Ill.Dec. 730 ILCS 5/5-5-3.1(a)(4), (a)(8) (West 1996). Counsel further explained that Anthony's testimony, which Judge Toomin had precluded at the previous hearing, would also be presented. As for Anthony, the police picked him up after defendant falsely implicated him as being involved in the homicide. A proper foundation is necessary for the admission of hospital records. The PEOPLE of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, According to Cummings, defendant stated that Sheila Daniels shot McCoy in the back of his head while McCoy was seated in his car in his garage. Further, after being at the station for two hours, She was not allowed to use the phone despite her numerous requests to call both Vrdolyak and her sister. Daniels I, 272 Ill.App.3d at 333, 208 Ill.Dec. memorial page for David Ray McCoy (6 Mar 1935-13 Nov 1988), Find a Grave Memorial ID 52651554, citing Cedar Park Cemetery, Calumet Park . See People v. Lucas, 132 Ill.2d 399, 417-18, 139 Ill.Dec. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. 1. 38, par. She further alleged that prior to seeing her brother Anthony in a beaten condition, police had threatened to charge her and/or Anthony with McCoy's murder for which they could receive the death penalty. The reason the evidence is new is that Tyrone would have invoked his fifth amendment right against self-incrimination had he been called to testify at defendant's motion to suppress. Jack O'Malley, State's Atty., County of Cook, Chicago (Renee Goldfarb, Margaret J. Faustmann and Clare T. McEnery, of counsel), for plaintiff-appellee. The instant case is similar to Enis and dissimilar to Jones. Another was where the defendant had been acquitted of some charges, thereby precluding him from seeking appellate review of the trial court's rulings. At that time, he had a girlfriend named Shiela Daniels. A jury of nine women and three men returned a verdict of.
Charlie Richardson Family Tree,
Articles D
As a part of Jhan Dhan Yojana, Bank of Baroda has decided to open more number of BCs and some Next-Gen-BCs who will rendering some additional Banking services. We as CBC are taking active part in implementation of this initiative of Bank particularly in the states of West Bengal, UP,Rajasthan,Orissa etc.
We got our robust technical support team. Members of this team are well experienced and knowledgeable. In addition we conduct virtual meetings with our BCs to update the development in the banking and the new initiatives taken by Bank and convey desires and expectation of Banks from BCs. In these meetings Officials from the Regional Offices of Bank of Baroda also take part. These are very effective during recent lock down period due to COVID 19.
Information and Communication Technology (ICT) is one of the Models used by Bank of Baroda for implementation of Financial Inclusion. ICT based models are (i) POS, (ii) Kiosk. POS is based on Application Service Provider (ASP) model with smart cards based technology for financial inclusion under the model, BCs are appointed by banks and CBCs These BCs are provided with point-of-service(POS) devices, using which they carry out transaction for the smart card holders at their doorsteps. The customers can operate their account using their smart cards through biometric authentication. In this system all transactions processed by the BC are online real time basis in core banking of bank. PoS devices deployed in the field are capable to process the transaction on the basis of Smart Card, Account number (card less), Aadhar number (AEPS) transactions.